Miruna-Daniela Ivan, Joshua Lillis, Eduardo Maqui and Carlos Cañon Salazar
![](https://i0.wp.com/bankunderground.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_2180129119-EXPANDED-USING-AI-ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.jpg?resize=829%2C660&ssl=1)
Funding markets are essential for wholesome and energetic monetary establishments, and consequently for everybody within the financial system. The repurchase settlement (repo) market performs a key function in financial institution and non-bank monetary establishments’ (NBFIs’) every day actions by facilitating short-term financing and danger hedging. On this put up, we use novel Securities Financing Transaction Regulation (SFTR) knowledge to spotlight new, and corroborate earlier, stylised repo haircut details.
What are repos? Why have they got haircuts? And why can we care?
A repo transaction is the simultaneous sale of, and ahead settlement to repurchase, securities at a particular value, at a future date (Duffie (1996)). The vendor receives money in alternate for the securities, whereas the customer earns a return on the money lent. The agreed value of repo transactions is often decrease than the market value of the safety used as collateral, and the distinction is called a ‘haircut’. Our evaluation will present haircuts primarily reply to counterparty credit score danger, however may even replicate a variety of danger, eg market and liquidity dangers.
Repo markets help value discovery and enhance liquidity in quite a lot of markets, however they’ll additionally pose dangers to monetary stability. They typically contain corporations taking (or extending) leverage and may create liquidity and maturity mismatches. They are often uncovered to run-like occasions – which the function of collateral can amplify. Given the function repo markets performed throughout earlier systemic episodes, eg the worldwide monetary disaster (GFC), the 2020 ‘sprint for money’, and the 2022 liability-driven funding (LDI) disaster, central banks and regulators monitor them carefully.
From earlier work we all know some stylised details about haircuts within the repo market, eg Kotidis and van Horen (2018), Julliard et al (2022), and Hüser et al (2024). Haircuts rely on counterparty traits, eg they are typically bigger for corporations with increased (perceived) credit score danger. Haircuts additionally rely on the traits of the underlying collateral. They’re usually bigger for longer maturity contracts, for increased Worth at Danger (VaR) collateral, and the place collateral is concentrated.
New knowledge, new insights…
Enhancing knowledge assortment has been a key a part of post-GFC regulatory initiatives to higher perceive securities financing markets. Below the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (SFTR) (launched in 2019), the Financial institution of England receives transaction-level knowledge on securities financing transactions from all UK-based contributors. It goals to enhance the transparency of markets and to allow higher monitoring of dangers.
SFTR knowledge present new insights into an space that helps core secondary market exercise just like the money gilt market, together with that by non-bank market contributors. Haircut knowledge in SFTR is extra complete and of upper high quality than different present sources. Improved market protection and haircut reporting permits us to interrupt down repo haircuts by collateral kind (eg gilts), maturity, and sector. It additionally gives new info on non-gilt government-bond repo markets, enabling us to match gilt haircuts to different core markets like US treasury securities.
Who’s out there for (bilateral) gilt repo?
Exercise within the bilateral gilt repo market is broadly concentrated within the dealer-to-client phase of the market. Sellers embrace prime brokers and different banks that usually lengthen money lending to NBFI shoppers that depend on the bilateral gilt repo marketplace for their liquidity and collateral operations. As in Hüser et al (2024), we discover cash market funds (MMFs) make up the biggest share of common every day quantity (round 33%). They’re vital (web) lenders of money – primarily within the in a single day phase of the repo market – to sellers. In flip, MMFs obtain medium (7–20 yr) and long-dated (>20 yr) gilts.
Along with earlier findings, SFTR knowledge present that hedge funds (HFs) make up the second largest share of common every day quantity (round 30%), being energetic on either side of the repo market; the typical tenor of this lending is between one and two weeks. HFs have been more and more energetic in authorities bond markets globally over the previous decade, with an acceleration in exercise during the last couple of years.
SFTR knowledge largely corroborate this. Chart 1 illustrates the construction of the bilateral gilt repo market throughout monetary sectors. Flows of the identical (totally different) color because the sector within the outer ring present money lending (borrowing) by (from) that sector. The width of the flows – indicated by the numbers within the outer ring – replicate the scale of excellent money lending and borrowing (in £ billions). We see a bigger share of excellent HF bilateral gilt repo money lending in comparison with MMFs because of the longer common tenor. Different NBFI contributors within the bilateral gilt repo market embrace asset managers (AMs), insurance coverage corporations and pension funds (PFs), in addition to LDI funds and different monetary establishments (OFIs).
New findings from SFTR knowledge additionally point out that non-dealer to non-dealer transactions characterize a small fraction of complete exercise. Chart 1 exhibits that almost all excellent transactions involving non-dealer counterparties are intermediated by sellers. Inter-dealer exercise is substantial, proven by the within-sector gray circulation for sellers. This highlights their key function as money lenders within the gilt repo market, which might be essential in periods of stress.
Chart 1: Monetary sector money lending community within the bilateral gilt repo market (inventory knowledge as of December 2023)
![](https://i0.wp.com/bankunderground.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ChartA.png?resize=524%2C435&ssl=1)
What do haircuts seem like?
Trying by way of totally different collateral sorts within the bilateral repo market, haircuts usually improve with the market danger (rate of interest and liquidity) of the underlying collateral (Chart 2). Authorities debt securities – extensively recognised because the ‘most secure’ non-cash belongings – have a median haircut of near zero in bilateral transactions between supplier banks and NBFIs. Per Julliard et al (2022), we discover that throughout the authorities bond repo market, haircuts replicate, partly, the danger of fluctuations within the collateral value (interest-rate danger). Longer-dated collateralised bonds usually contain increased haircuts largely as a result of being extra delicate to rate of interest adjustments. In the meantime, repo backed by riskier debt securities – akin to debt issued by banks and NBFIs – attracts common haircuts of over 5%, however this stays far smaller than the 35% common haircuts on principal index fairness repos.
Chart 2: Quantity-weighted common bilateral repo haircuts by collateral kind (knowledge from 15 June to 1 July 2023)
![](https://i0.wp.com/bankunderground.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ChartB.png?resize=693%2C251&ssl=1)
Inspecting the federal government bond repo market in additional element, SFTR knowledge present that gilt repo haircuts are usually near-zero (between 0%–2%). In the meantime, haircuts on repo transactions backed by US Treasury securities are at or under 0.5% for many of our pattern, with a notable improve (to just about 1.5%) across the time of the Spring 2023 banking sector turmoil (Chart 3). This slight variation in haircut ranges throughout authorities bond repo gives some additional proof that the extent of haircuts additionally displays the diploma of market liquidity within the underlying collateral securities.
Chart 3: Quantity-weighted common bilateral haircuts on authorities bond repos
![](https://i0.wp.com/bankunderground.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ChartC.png?resize=490%2C259&ssl=1)
Close to-zero bilateral haircuts in gilt repo are partly pushed by market construction and aggressive dynamics, past prudent danger administration concerns, as highlighted by the PRA’s 2023 thematic overview of main banks’ fastened earnings financing. Zero haircuts may correspond to a set of transactions (usually known as ‘nettable packages’) whereby a supplier has a virtually equivalent amount of money acquired/payable with the identical consumer over the identical tenor, which might be netted out (Hempel et al (2023)).
However not all bilateral gilt repo is transacted with zero haircut. In truth, lower than half of bilateral repo quantity (round 40%) is so. There may be excessive heterogeneity past trades with near-zero haircut pricing, which is essentially pushed by counterparty traits, akin to credit score danger concerns (Gorton and Metrick (2012); Copeland et al (2014); Krishnamurthy et al (2014); Mancini et al (2016); and Boissel et al (2017)).
SFTR knowledge corroborates earlier proof exhibiting that haircuts have a tendency to extend with counterparty credit score danger. We see this by evaluating haircut ranges throughout totally different NBFI contributors within the gilt repo market each in regular instances and in careworn monetary market situations. Specializing in the LDI disaster as a case examine, Chart 4 exhibits that haircuts charged on LDI funds and PFs elevated procyclically throughout this stress episode and remained elevated for a while, largely reflecting increased credit score danger. This procyclicality amplified market dysfunction by elevating the price of repo borrowing for NBFIs (see Pinter (2023)). For recognized HFs in SFTR knowledge, nonetheless, haircuts on repo gilt transactions have remained unchanged over time, and near near-zero ranges.
Chart 4: twenty fifth–seventy fifth percentile distribution of haircuts on bilateral gilt repo and reverse repo transactions throughout counterparty sectors
![](https://i0.wp.com/bankunderground.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ChartD.png?resize=491%2C316&ssl=1)
What implications can we draw from the evaluation?
On this put up we use novel SFTR knowledge to indicate that variation in haircuts is essentially pushed by counterparty credit score danger concerns, though different elements play an element, together with the traits of the underlying collateral securities. So, nobody haircut matches all.
We discover proof of procyclical haircut fluctuations within the LDI and PF sectors in the course of the 2022 LDI disaster. These had been gradual to return to pre-crisis ranges on the again of heightened credit score danger. Additional work utilizing SFTR knowledge is required to analyse the resilience of sterling markets, given the potential of haircut procyclicality to exacerbate liquidity calls for throughout stress and amplify market dysfunction.
However, the low stage of haircuts confronted by HFs could recommend that substantial leveraging might be going down in a big bilateral gilt repo market phase with out applicable danger mitigation. This deserves steady monitoring given its potential monetary stability implications.
Carlos Cañon Salazar and Joshua Lillis work within the Financial institution’s Market Intelligence and Evaluation Division and Miruna-Daniela Ivan and Eduardo Maqui work within the Financial institution’s Market-Primarily based Finance Division.
If you wish to get in contact, please electronic mail us at [email protected] or depart a remark under.
Feedback will solely seem as soon as authorized by a moderator, and are solely printed the place a full title is equipped. Financial institution Underground is a weblog for Financial institution of England workers to share views that problem – or help – prevailing coverage orthodoxies. The views expressed listed here are these of the authors, and usually are not essentially these of the Financial institution of England, or its coverage committees.
Share the put up “‘Nobody size matches all’ – haircuts within the repo market”